The relationship between the process of remembering and the process of self- narration in Horlock`s The Book of Lies and Roth`s Indignation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26389/AJSRP.N01118Keywords:
discontent, book of lies, German occupation, identity, self, novel, memory, generational memory, crowded history, Nazism, maturity, adolescence, history, trauma, credibility, fallibility, pitfalls, war, security mania, suicideAbstract
In the Book of Lies by Mary Horlock and Indignation by Philip Roth, the relationship between the process of remembering and the process of self -narration is embodied creatively. As a fellow contemporary writer Julian Barnes points out: ‘Memory is identity....You are what you have done; what you have done is in your memory; what you remember defines who you are; when you forget your life you cease to be, even before your death.’([1]).This paper will examine the profound impact of memory on the two narrators (protagonists as well); Catherine and Marcus, and how they construct identity in their narrations` process. It will shed light on how both narrators allow their past to illuminate their current lives. Recollecting past memories of school, campus life, parents and friends has a great influence on narrating the two stories. Moreover, referring to historical memories of Korean War and German occupation of Guernsey is a significant factor of defining the (self) for Catherine and Marcus.





